Retropie is intended for use by people with technical skills, indeed.
That does not make Recalbox a "better" product, just more suited to a wider audience.

No statement yet or did I miss something ?

I am aware of GitHub and GitLab repositories.
Still, they do not provide source code matching 4.0.2 and 4.1 unstable releases.

You should read GPL license to understand the issue.

Hello,

I can't find the source code for recalbox 4.1 unstable and 4.0.2 stable releases.
This is a massive GPL violation as you have to provide the source code of any release from your software (since it includes hundreds if not thousands of GPL projects), or provide the end-user at least a point of contact to request the source code.

So....

You promised to release the 4.1 source code alongside the "stable" release.
Still nothing on GitLab and/or GitHub.

How many months do you plan to continue violating GPL license ?
I will have to escalate this to Free Software Foundation.

Looking forward for your official statement then.

Que d'agressivité...

@digitalumberjack Okay, looking forward for the release.

@reivaax
I can write code, I do write code, I even wrote for some of the projects Recalbox is using.
And these projects are GPL. So please respect that.
If you don't understand open source licenses, GIYF.

So....

You promised to release the 4.1 source code alongside the "stable" release.
Still nothing on GitLab and/or GitHub.

How many months do you plan to continue violating GPL license ?
I will have to escalate this to Free Software Foundation.

Retropie is intended for use by people with technical skills, indeed.
That does not make Recalbox a "better" product, just more suited to a wider audience.

No statement yet or did I miss something ?

Looking forward for your official statement then.

I am aware of GitHub and GitLab repositories.
Still, they do not provide source code matching 4.0.2 and 4.1 unstable releases.

You should read GPL license to understand the issue.

Hello,

I can't find the source code for recalbox 4.1 unstable and 4.0.2 stable releases.
This is a massive GPL violation as you have to provide the source code of any release from your software (since it includes hundreds if not thousands of GPL projects), or provide the end-user at least a point of contact to request the source code.