how many version of mame is already available in Rb 6.1 (mame 2000, mame 2003, mame 2003+, mame 2010, mame 2015, advance mame?)

for the rest about my personal spending i can bring down your argument in only one objective sentence, but i wont by respect to the promise i made to OyyoDams (if you want to know it just PM me )

how many version of mame is already available in Rb 6.1 (mame 2000, mame 2003, mame 2003+, mame 2010, mame 2015, advance mame?)

for the rest about my personal spending i can bring down your argument in only one objective sentence, but i wont by respect to the promise i made to OyyoDams (if you want to know it just PM me )

and please can we stay on the topics: availability of old core regarding to CPS3 games slowdown in "old" generation Rpi?

i dont have any issue regarding my living place and/or salary, just put back things in perspective when he was saying
"If we have to stop fixing issues so that people can keep using broken emulation on an outdated 35$ computer instead of buying the new version of that same computer, which handles the fixed emulation, we might as well stop developping emulators",

but i will not do it anymore

mmm maybe you missed the point, you are the develloper of FBneo, of course you are trying to always improve and fixing issue, even if it involve performance, and as you said fbneo is an emulator for desktop computer... here i was speaking to the developpers of recalbox, especially about the Rpi package.

So let me go in angry mode too:

First i live in cambodia and y average salary is 600$ which is far above the average salary already, so please come back in consideration what could 35$ represent with this new ratio.

And second why i couldnt address this issue to RB developers? it is up to them to include the last iteration of FB, but also as they still include old mame version or even FBA2x in regard to less powerfull pi owner, why couldnt they keep both version of FB the 0.39 and the 0.44, knowingthat we cannot use any versus fighting CPS3 game without crackling sound and less than 60 fps as long as we cannot afford at least the pi3b+ (which by the way since the release of pi4 became more aound 55$ nowadays) with the last available RB version ???

angry mode off

by the way i managed to roll back to FBa .39 as mentionned earlier, and now i can play again all my games at 60 fps , perfect sound, still working even with the last retroarch version and new menu.... i woul have prefered to have the choice to select for each game the core version, because to acheive that without too musch hassle i have to replace the fbneo core with the old one but with same name, meaning all my neo geo roms have to be re tweaked with my personal option. but i am happy with it now, just thinking of all other people facing the same problem....

well from what i understand , the core need to be recompiled?

i found a temporary solution by renomming the fba core with same name of fbneo core and it is working, but i would prefer to have the choice between the two for actual roms compability set

cheers for anyone who can help

and please developer note that we are in difficult situation with the new fbneo core for every Rpi under the 3b+ with cps3 fighting game (drop in fps also occurs with asura blade and jojo ba)
update should not bring less performance isnt it ? dont get me wrong i more than aprreciate all the work done, i love RB just want to bring out this problem

Hello,

i would like to have back the old core fb liretro from rb 4.1 (which allowed me 60 fbs in SF3 third strike on my pi3b, as the new fbneo doesnt with only 52 fps and crackling sound).

i found fba_libretro.so file from my old 4.1 image and place it under usr\lib\libretro alongside other cores

what should i do now to have the possibilty to select this core under the roms metadata core option (as now i can only select the default libretro fbneo core)

i guess to add a line in es_system.cfg will not be enough, as maybe the option to select the core's name i would write there will be apparent, but it should have another thing to set up somewhere to effetively lunch the wanted core i added...

any help?

cheers

@barbudreadmon ok noted with great thanks, really appreciate the time you spent to answer my question, respect

@barbudreadmon sadly frameskip is poorly impletemented in RB: i tried and it is not related to the actual loss in frame, but to pre determined ratio (1 skip on 2 frame, then 2/3, 3/4, 4/5 and finally 5 skip on 6 frames) meaning i cannot in anyway have a 52 fps that looks fluid with no sound problem.
I think again it is more a question to ask to RB developper: is it possible in RB 6.1 to roll back to old FBneo core for the one that was present in 4.1, which allowed me 60 fps in SF3 ?

cheers

@barbudreadmon
wow respect for development i didnt know!

i am thinking of a pi3b+ because i play sf3 too much... or maybe i just saw that a RB 6.2 has been release few days ago, and in the notes they wrotes this:

B*mp retroarch to v1.8.5
B*mp retroarch-cheats to v1.8.5
B*mp libretro-assets on last version
B*mp libretro-cores family

so it seems they updated the cores, ut would it still enough on a 3b ?

i will give a try

thanks again

@barbudreadmon
wow thank you so much to confirm me that , do you think a pi3b+ clocked at 1400 mhz would solve the problem ? (one guy told me that he doesnt have these slow down on his pi3b+ so i guess yes)
i will try what happen with frame skip thanks

any idea for the blinking controlers?

cheers again